----------
devart said the following:
We have moved 6 of your deviations to Photography > People & Portraits > Glamour Portraits.
The reason this may have happened can be read in FAQ: Why was my deviation moved?
Moved Deviation: Andi - 08
Moved Deviation: Nicole - 12
Moved Deviation #3: Nicole - 06
Moved Deviation #4: Nicole - 03
Moved Deviation #5: Nicole - 01
Moved Deviation #6: Reina - 01
----------
Really fucking stupid in my opinion.
So the rule is any shred of clothing qualifies the photo as glamour? I do not shoot glamour and I do not pretend to. Once again, artist intent means nothing on dA.
UPDATE: I can't make this shit up...this is the reply I got: "It appears your deviations were relocated because the model in them is not entirely nude."
--
many of my images can be purchased through my website [link]
my '09 calendar can be purchased through red bubble:
[link]
--
beauty subdued - still in progress
I support *deviant-ARCADE [link]
Previous Page12345...Next Page